Monthly Archives: June 2010

reality in an ideologically-driven debate: private is simply not always better than public

One of of the many factors that bedevils any effort to reform regulation in the United States is an unwaivering belief that private is always better than public. This is a creed and it is certainly superior to many of the alternatives. The problem is that many Americans hold this belief with a fanatical blindness,…

Read more »

when $61bn seemed like real money

The Jérôme Kerviel three-week trial ended in Paris on Friday, and that means that this post is my last in this series.  Kerviel will have to wait until October 5, when the Court has said that it will announce its decision, to find out whether he’ll spend the next four years in jail and be…

Read more »

denial: it ain’t just a river in egypt

In this series of posts on the Jérôme Kerviel trial, I’ve argued that, contrary to Société Générale’s contentions that they were duped by a genius, the bank itself is to blame for Kerviel’s massive losses. Soc Gen ignored major warning signs regarding the size and scope of Kerviel’s trades, and ultimately was complicit in the…

Read more »

of foxes and farmers: clawing back executive bonuses

Now that the frenzy of attention over fraud charges leveled by the Securities and Exchange Commission against Goldman Sachs has quieted somewhat, it’s worth noting another arena where the agency is flexing its regulatory muscle. In a case that this week survived a motion to dismiss in a federal court in Arizona, the SEC is…

Read more »

it’s the stupid culture

In my last post, it’s the culture, stupid, I noted that a review of the Société Générale scandal reveals a familiar pattern of organizational and departmental change that stressed trading and oversight systems, followed by a failure to respond to common red flags and warning signals. But, rather than increasing their vigilance regarding potential employee…

Read more »

it’s the culture, stupid

In testimony last week, Eric Cordelle, Jérôme Kerviel’s immediate supervisor at Société Générale confirmed a point about which I’ve previously blogged: the Delta One desk on which Jérôme Kerviel worked at Société Générale exceeded trading limits “quite frequently.”  Cordelle claimed, however, “that this was usually for technical reasons and he had not known of a…

Read more »

kerviel’s fake trades: genius or copy cat?

In my last post, kerviel’s fake trades: the anatomy of a cover-up, I began discussing the fake trades Kerviel employed to disguise his unauthorized losses (and gains).  Contrary to Société Générale’s assertions that Kerviel’s sophisticated cover-up scheme, enabled by his intimate knowledge of the back-office system, prevented supervisors and bank management from detecting his unauthorized…

Read more »

kerviel’s fake trades: the anatomy of a cover-up

Regular ParetoCommons readers know that I’ve been doing a series of posts on the Jérôme Kerviel trial, which ends today in Paris.  I wanted to talk a bit in this post about the testimony relating to Kerviel’s cover up scheme – the “fake trades.” According to the FT: The courtroom at the Palais de Justice…

Read more »

aiding and abetting: senator dodd and corporate frauds

Shame on you Christopher Dodd. You had a chance to address one of the serious weaknesses in financial reporting – the lack of individual accountability for fraud – any you deftly steered away from the problem and into the hands of those who have only their interests to be served. In 1994 in Central Bank…

Read more »

on warning signs ii: follow the money

As I noted in my last post, on warning signs: you can’t get there from here, a failure to inquire into unusual growth in profits, risk, or trading volume is not unique to Jerome Kerviel’s Société Générale experience.  Instead, it is a common pattern across modern rogue trading scandals. For example, in February 2002, Allied…

Read more »

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE